Why music is not enough for an artist fan club

Cover image for Why music is not enough for an artist fan club

Photo: Daniel Guerra

With 90,000 AI-generated tracks uploaded to Deezer every day(at time of writing), AI-generated music now constitutes the majority of new releases on the platform. Music was an oversaturated world before AI, with 60,000 tracks released a day in 2021, but a threefold increase in five years makes that number seem mundane.

In this new world, the quality of music is increasingly standardised by AI powered production tools. When anyone can make a ‘good enough’ sounding song and recording, originality requires a new threshold and becomes more extreme (i.e., Angine de Poutrine). 

What it means to be an artist needs to change if they are to survive. Paid music fans, including 50% of merch buyers, are more likely than the average consumer to be doing more in person activities. This means the role and goal of artist development for the next generation of talent needs to be grounded in the real world.

Artist development has typically focused on the individual artist and their sound. However, in order to build a sustainable career, the primary responsibility of an artist today is to develop and grow a consistent community. What is changing is how when that community comes together – it often isn’t around music.

From fan base to fan club

The value of music is increasingly found at the intersection of lives and communities outside of the traditional music business. Artists like Låpsley, Jelly Roll, and Diplo starting supper and running clubs for their fans, SM Entertainment launching SMTown Run Club 26 in Korea, and the ‘running raves’ of Midnight Runners Ciudad de México all show that the need for connection and community is global and deeply human.

As social lives have moved online, we are increasingly waking up to what has been lost in the real world. Connection to a physical community is a fundamental human need that is being eroded. Artists are well-placed to fill the void and build the communities of tomorrow through artist-led clubs. The differentiator for future clubs is that key difference between the music clubs of yesterday and the ones of tomorrow is that often, music is now a thread running through the community, rather than its anchor – which may be food, running, skating, or anything else.

If artists can build communities around diversified interests, the resulting loyalty of the fans they create will likely be worth more than anything a stream could offer. It will also be worth more for the fans, to whom recorded music has become ubiquitous. In this environment, the artist’s role is to go beyond being entertainers, to become leaders of communities, clubs and social spaces.

Artists as leaders

The world of community development is becoming more competitive as it is now asked of creators across entertainment - from comedians and podcasters to consumer goods brands. Even athletics is ushering in a new generation, with athletes like Arch Manning and Livvy Dunne seeing greater returns through monetising their audience than through their athletic talents alone.

This is an age of the persistent and pervasive personality, where being forgotten is the easiest and perhaps most devastating thing that can happen to an artist. Artists are in a unique position to use their musical talent as a gateway to embed themselves in communities as leaders and organisers. As a result, they become more than their performances or unique talent,they become people who shape the way fans live their lives, within and beyond music.

Want the latest entertainment research and insights directly to your inbox? Our newsletter has you covered, click here to subscribe.

There are comments on this post join the discussion.

Add your comment

Comments

Quirin pierre
L' I.A est toujours sourde !!! La preuve : impossible de faire corriger les erreurs de mixage audio avant les nettoyages et même ces nettoyages avant les conformations précédentes à la masterisation (mastering) par exemple sur ProTools HD et LogicsPro. Donc, ce travail n'est pas automatisable et doit être fait à l' oreille et à la main par le producteur, le créateur et l'ingénieur du son.
Jeffrey Anthony
The crisis of limitless sonic objects secreted from latent-space machines is correctly identified here: “In this new world, the quality of music is increasingly standardised by AI powered production tools.” But the proposed response accepts the very conception of musical value that produced the crisis in the first place. If AI can reproduce the desired surface qualities of a recording, the conclusion that musicians should become less like musicians and more like entrepreneurs and social hosts is, to use a Whiteheadian phrase, to argue that artists should become increasingly rock-like: continuously present, reliably available, indefinitely reproducible, and resistant to disappearance. “The art of persistence is to be dead.” We at the Musical Form Institute developed the Certificate of Embodied Production (CEP) as an intervention into this an intervention into crisis. The CEP is a certification mark for sound recordings that makes legible the labor and expression of the musicians involved by verifying that the final recording was created without grid correction, pitch correction, or generative AI, and that its musical decisions were made in real time and preserved as performed. Its value resides in certifying that what one hears is the smoke from an originating fire, the trace of an embodied musical act rather than a sonic object optimized toward a machine-defined ideal of perfection. We invite artists to submit their songs for certification. Certified recordings are entered into a public registry that anyone can search. Our application to federally register the CEP certification mark is in the final stages of the USPTO process and has reached the publication stage (Serial No. 99559776). Once registration is complete, the CEP will be a federally registered certification mark in the same legal category as ENERGY STAR and Certified California Sustainable Winegrowing, marks that tell the public a product has met defined standards. At MFI we view AI standardization as a reason to recover and recognize the value already present in the embodied act of making music, rather than as a demand that artist reshape themselves around the 'requirements' of the attention economy.